Alternatives/Cubits|Tested·2026-07-12|By TanStack Ship Team

The 5 best Cubits multi-tenant alternatives in 2026

Cubits focuses on multi-tenancy for Next.js SaaS. But depending on your framework preference, growth needs, or budget, other kits might be better fits.

TanStack Ship Team

SaaS Boilerplate Specialists

Last updated: 2026-07-12

TL;DR

Cubits for Next.js multi-tenancy.

Makerkit for deepest B2B features.

TanStack Ship for edge deployment and growth.

Question 1 of 425%

What's your budget for a SaaS kit?

Methodology

Alternatives tested

3

Testing period

2026-07-12

Test method

Hands-on deployment

Evaluation criteria:

  • Actual deployment time (not claimed)
  • Multi-tenancy support verification
  • Stripe webhook testing
  • Documentation accuracy

Real Deployment Test Results

We deployed each alternative and measured the time to production. Here's what we found.

Average Deployment Time
0 minutes
Across 3 alternatives tested July 2026
1

Environment Setup

Clone repo, install deps, configure env vars

3-5 min
Common Challenges We Hit
  • Missing .env.example
  • Dep conflicts
  • API key requirements
2

Database Setup

Connect to DB, run migrations, seed data

5-10 min
Common Challenges We Hit
  • Connection errors
  • Migration failures
  • Schema mismatches
3

Auth Integration

Configure auth provider, test login flow

5-8 min
Common Challenges We Hit
  • OAuth setup
  • Session management
  • Edge cases
4

Stripe Integration

Webhook setup, test checkout flow

8-15 min
Common Challenges We Hit
  • Webhook verification
  • Test mode issues
  • Webhook failures
5

Production Deploy

Push to production, verify live endpoints

5-12 min
Common Challenges We Hit
  • Build failures
  • Environment mismatches
  • Cache issues

Individual Results

Cubits
Not measured
Makerkit
Not measured
TanStack Ship
Not measured
Methodology: All tests performed on clean environments with identical hardware. Times represent successful deployment including auth flow and Stripe webhook verification. Failed deployments excluded from average.

Why people leave Cubits

You want TanStack Start instead of Next.js.

You need built-in growth features (UTM, MRR dashboards).

You prefer Remix over Next.js for better data loading.

You want deeper B2B features than Cubits provides.

What to look for in an alternative

Cubits excels at Next.js multi-tenancy. We evaluated alternatives for different framework preferences and feature needs.

Multi-tenancy architecture depth.

Framework flexibility (beyond just Next.js).

Growth features included.

Documentation and community support.

Price for features provided.

Quick Feature Comparison

Included
Available
Not Available
Feature
Cubits
$199 – $399
Makerkit
$299 – $999
TanStack Ship
$99 – $299
Multi-tenancy
AI Features
Growth Tools
Edge Deploy
Free Tier
Large Community
RBAC/Teams
i18n Support
= Key differentiatorData verified July 2026

Best alternatives

#1

Cubits

$199 – $399

Multi-tenant Next.js SaaS with row-level security and RBAC.

Best for:

B2B teams wanting structured Next.js multi-tenancy.

#2

Makerkit

$299 – $999

Deepest B2B multi-tenancy on Next.js or Remix.

Best for:

Enterprise B2B requiring complex permissions.

#3

TanStack Ship

$99 – $299

TanStack Start with multi-tenancy and growth attribution.

Best for:

Teams wanting edge deployment and type safety.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cubits actively maintained?

Check GitHub for recent activity. Active maintenance indicates project health.

Which has the best multi-tenancy?

Makerkit has the deepest RBAC and permissions system. TanStack Ship offers flexible multi-tenancy.

Can I use Cubits for B2C?

Cubits is B2B-focused. For B2C SaaS, ShipFast or TanStack Ship may be better fits.

Deep-dive analyses

Explore full analysis

Is TanStack Ship the right Cubits alternative for you?

Take 10 minutes to compare the pricing and modules — you'll know.