Cubits
Multi-tenant Next.js SaaS with row-level security and RBAC.
Best for:
B2B teams wanting structured Next.js multi-tenancy.
Cubits focuses on multi-tenancy for Next.js SaaS. But depending on your framework preference, growth needs, or budget, other kits might be better fits.
TanStack Ship Team
SaaS Boilerplate Specialists
Cubits for Next.js multi-tenancy.
Makerkit for deepest B2B features.
TanStack Ship for edge deployment and growth.
Alternatives tested
3
Testing period
2026-07-12
Test method
Hands-on deployment
Evaluation criteria:
We deployed each alternative and measured the time to production. Here's what we found.
Clone repo, install deps, configure env vars
Connect to DB, run migrations, seed data
Configure auth provider, test login flow
Webhook setup, test checkout flow
Push to production, verify live endpoints
You want TanStack Start instead of Next.js.
You need built-in growth features (UTM, MRR dashboards).
You prefer Remix over Next.js for better data loading.
You want deeper B2B features than Cubits provides.
Cubits excels at Next.js multi-tenancy. We evaluated alternatives for different framework preferences and feature needs.
Multi-tenancy architecture depth.
Framework flexibility (beyond just Next.js).
Growth features included.
Documentation and community support.
Price for features provided.
Multi-tenant Next.js SaaS with row-level security and RBAC.
Best for:
B2B teams wanting structured Next.js multi-tenancy.
Deepest B2B multi-tenancy on Next.js or Remix.
Best for:
Enterprise B2B requiring complex permissions.
TanStack Start with multi-tenancy and growth attribution.
Best for:
Teams wanting edge deployment and type safety.
Check GitHub for recent activity. Active maintenance indicates project health.
Makerkit has the deepest RBAC and permissions system. TanStack Ship offers flexible multi-tenancy.
Cubits is B2B-focused. For B2C SaaS, ShipFast or TanStack Ship may be better fits.
Take 10 minutes to compare the pricing and modules — you'll know.